Porgy and Bess was groundbreaking: an opera about poor African-Americans in South Carolina, starring a cripple, a tramp, and a drug dealer. This weekend a new production opens on Broadway entitled The Gershwins’ Porgy and Bess, but it’s not the one George and Ira presented in 1935. Audiences will get new dialogue, back stories, and orchestrations courtesy of playwright Suzan-Lori Parks, director Diane Paulus, and musical director Deirdre Murray.
Parks, a Pulitzer Prize-winner, was approached by the Gershwins’ estates to turn the opera into a musical. “Right away it was very clear that these people who were singing these songs of love and passion, triumph and failure,” she tells Kurt Andersen, “they deserve a story that is equal to it.” She saw her job as not to rewrite but to fill in. “Dramaturgically, there are some holes in it,” she explains. “We just added a bridge – it’s a bridge not just to fill in a gap, but to provide Porgy and Bess, and the whole community actually with a strong story arc.”
Even before the show opened, traditionalists were distressed. Stephen Sondheim wrote a fiery letter to the New York Times blasting the production, in particular its title: “In the interest of truth in advertising, let it not be called The Gershwins’ Porgy and Bess, nor even The Gershwin-Heyward Porgy and Bess. Advertise it honestly as Diane Paulus’s Porgy and Bess. And the hell with the real one.”
Suzan-Lori Parks (Stephanie Diani)
Parks stands by her changes and the title. “It’s as if the Gershwin Estate has a brownstone, they invited me to do some work on their brownstone. It’s their brownstone. … End of conversation.”
Parks remembers the first time she saw Porgy and Bess: she was in 2nd grade and she caught the 1959 movie on “the late late late late late late late show. And five minutes of it and I just was like ‘Oh, I don’t think so.'” She remembers, “It looked like one of those movies where they didn’t quite get to know us like I knew us.”
But those inaccuracies do not amount to racism, Parks thinks: “A lot of people hear ‘Suzan-Lori Parks is working on [the new production],’ or ‘a black woman is working on it’ … She’ll find it racist,'” she says, frustrated. “And me, I’m sitting here as a Pulitzer Prize-winning, Macarthur ‘genius’ writer. I look at it, yes, as a black woman, but also as a writer.”
>> Have you seen The Gershwins’ Porgy and Bess? Tell us what you thought in a comment below.
Have you seen The Gershwins’ Porgy and Bess? Tell us what you thought in a comment below.Porgy and Bess was groundbreaking: an opera about poor African-Americans in South Carolina, starring a cripple, a tramp, and a drug dealer. This weekend a new production opens on Broadway entitled The Gerschwins’ Porgy and Bess, but it’s not the one George and Ira presented in 1935. Audiences will get new dialogue, back stories, and orchestrations courtesy of playwright Suzan-Lori Parks, director Diane Paulus, and musical director Deirdre Murray.
Parks, a Pulitzer Prize-winner, was approached by the Gershwins’ estates to turn the opera into a musical. “Right away it was very clear that these people who were singing these songs of love and passion, triumph and failure,” she tells Kurt Andersen, “[and] they deserve a story that is equal to it.” Her job was not to rewrite but to fill in. “Dramaturgically, there are some holes in it,” she explains. “We just added a bridge — it’s a bridge not just to fill in a gap, but to provide Porgy and Bess, and the whole community actually with a strong story arc.”
Even before the show opened, traditionalists were distressed. Stephen Sondheim wrote a fiery letter to the New York Times blasting the production, in particular its title: “In the interest of truth in advertising, let it not be called The Gershwins’ Porgy and Bess, nor even The Gershwin-Heyward Porgy and Bess. Advertise it honestly as Diane Paulus’s Porgy and Bess. And the hell with the real one.”
Parks stands by her changes and the right to make them. “It’s as if the Gershwin Estate has a brownstone, they invited me to do some work on their brownstone. It’s their brownstone. … End of conversation.”
Parks remembers the first time she saw Porgy and Bess: she was in 2nd grade and she caught the 1959 movie on “the late late late late late late late show. And five minutes of it and I just was like ‘Oh, I don’t think so.” She remembers, “It looked like one of those movies where they didn’t quite get to know us like I knew us.”
But those inaccuracies do not amount to racism, Parks thinks: “A lot of people hear ‘Suzan-Lori Parks is working on [the new production],’ or ‘a black woman is working on it’ … She’ll find it racist,'” she says, frustrated. “And me, I’m sitting here as a Pulitzer Prize-winning, Macarthur ‘genius’ writer. I look at it, yes, as a black woman, but also as a writer.”
Have you seen The Gershwins’ Porgy and Bess? Tell us what you thought in a comment below.
Porgy and Bess was groundbreaking: an opera about poor African-Americans in South Carolina, starring a cripple, a tramp, and a drug dealer. This weekend a new production opens on Broadway entitled The Gerschwins’ Porgy and Bess, but it’s not the one George and Ira presented in 1935. Audiences will get new dialogue, back stories, and orchestrations courtesy of playwright Suzan-Lori Parks, director Diane Paulus, and musical director Deirdre Murray.
Parks, a Pulitzer Prize-winner, was approached by the Gershwins’ estates to turn the opera into a musical. “Right away it was very clear that these people who were singing these songs of love and passion, triumph and failure,” she tells Kurt Andersen, “[and] they deserve a story that is equal to it.” Her job was not to rewrite but to fill in. “Dramaturgically, there are some holes in it,” she explains. “We just added a bridge — it’s a bridge not just to fill in a gap, but to provide Porgy and Bess, and the whole community actually with a strong story arc.”
Even before the show opened, traditionalists were distressed. Stephen Sondheim wrote a fiery letter to the New York Times blasting the production, in particular its title: “In the interest of truth in advertising, let it not be called The Gershwins’ Porgy and Bess, nor even The Gershwin-Heyward Porgy and Bess. Advertise it honestly as Diane Paulus’s Porgy and Bess. And the hell with the real one.”
Parks stands by her changes and the right to make them. “It’s as if the Gershwin Estate has a brownstone, they invited me to do some work on their brownstone. It’s their brownstone. … End of conversation.”
Parks remembers the first time she saw Porgy and Bess: she was in 2nd grade and she caught the 1959 movie on “the late late late late late late late show. And five minutes of it and I just was like ‘Oh, I don’t think so.” She remembers, “It looked like one of those movies where they didn’t quite get to know us like I knew us.”
But those inaccuracies do not amount to racism, Parks thinks: “A lot of people hear ‘Suzan-Lori Parks is working on [the new production],’ or ‘a black woman is working on it’ … She’ll find it racist,'” she says, frustrated. “And me, I’m sitting here as a Pulitzer Prize-winning, Macarthur ‘genius’ writer. I look at it, yes, as a black woman, but also as a writer.”
Have you seen The Gershwins’ Porgy and Bess? Tell us what you thought in a comment below.Porgy and Bess was groundbreaking: an opera about poor African-Americans in South Carolina, starring a cripple, a tramp, and a drug dealer. This weekend a new production opens on Broadway entitled The Gerschwins’ Porgy and Bess, but it’s not the one George and Ira presented in 1935. Audiences will get new dialogue, back stories, and orchestrations courtesy of playwright Suzan-Lori Parks, director Diane Paulus, and musical director Deirdre Murray.
Parks, a Pulitzer Prize-winner, was approached by the Gershwins’ estates to turn the opera into a musical. “Right away it was very clear that these people who were singing these songs of love and passion, triumph and failure,” she tells Kurt Andersen, “[and] they deserve a story that is equal to it.” Her job was not to rewrite but to fill in. “Dramaturgically, there are some holes in it,” she explains. “We just added a bridge — it’s a bridge not just to fill in a gap, but to provide Porgy and Bess, and the whole community actually with a strong story arc.”
Even before the show opened, traditionalists were distressed. Stephen Sondheim wrote a fiery letter to the New York Times blasting the production, in particular its title: “In the interest of truth in advertising, let it not be called The Gershwins’ Porgy and Bess, nor even The Gershwin-Heyward Porgy and Bess. Advertise it honestly as Diane Paulus’s Porgy and Bess. And the hell with the real one.”
Parks stands by her changes and the right to make them. “It’s as if the Gershwin Estate has a brownstone, they invited me to do some work on their brownstone. It’s their brownstone. … End of conversation.”
Parks remembers the first time she saw Porgy and Bess: she was in 2nd grade and she caught the 1959 movie on “the late late late late late late late show. And five minutes of it and I just was like ‘Oh, I don’t think so.” She remembers, “It looked like one of those movies where they didn’t quite get to know us like I knew us.”
But those inaccuracies do not amount to racism, Parks thinks: “A lot of people hear ‘Suzan-Lori Parks is working on [the new production],’ or ‘a black woman is working on it’ … She’ll find it racist,'” she says, frustrated. “And me, I’m sitting here as a Pulitzer Prize-winning, Macarthur ‘genius’ writer. I look at it, yes, as a black woman, but also as a writer.”
Have you seen The Gershwins’ Porgy and Bess? Tell us what you thought in a comment below.Porgy and Bess was groundbreaking: an opera about poor African-Americans in South Carolina, starring a cripple, a tramp, and a drug dealer. This weekend a new production opens on Broadway entitled The Gerschwins’ Porgy and Bess, but it’s not the one George and Ira presented in 1935. Audiences will get new dialogue, back stories, and orchestrations courtesy of playwright Suzan-Lori Parks, director Diane Paulus, and musical director Deirdre Murray.
Parks, a Pulitzer Prize-winner, was approached by the Gershwins’ estates to turn the opera into a musical. “Right away it was very clear that these people who were singing these songs of love and passion, triumph and failure,” she tells Kurt Andersen, “[and] they deserve a story that is equal to it.” Her job was not to rewrite but to fill in. “Dramaturgically, there are some holes in it,” she explains. “We just added a bridge — it’s a bridge not just to fill in a gap, but to provide Porgy and Bess, and the whole community actually with a strong story arc.”
Even before the show opened, traditionalists were distressed. Stephen Sondheim wrote a fiery letter to the New York Times blasting the production, in particular its title: “In the interest of truth in advertising, let it not be called The Gershwins’ Porgy and Bess, nor even The Gershwin-Heyward Porgy and Bess. Advertise it honestly as Diane Paulus’s Porgy and Bess. And the hell with the real one.”
Parks stands by her changes and the right to make them. “It’s as if the Gershwin Estate has a brownstone, they invited me to do some work on their brownstone. It’s their brownstone. … End of conversation.”
Parks remembers the first time she saw Porgy and Bess: she was in 2nd grade and she caught the 1959 movie on “the late late late late late late late show. And five minutes of it and I just was like ‘Oh, I don’t think so.” She remembers, “It looked like one of those movies where they didn’t quite get to know us like I knew us.”
But those inaccuracies do not amount to racism, Parks thinks: “A lot of people hear ‘Suzan-Lori Parks is working on [the new production],’ or ‘a black woman is working on it’ … She’ll find it racist,'” she says, frustrated. “And me, I’m sitting here as a Pulitzer Prize-winning, Macarthur ‘genius’ writer. I look at it, yes, as a black woman, but also as a writer.”
Have you seen The Gershwins’ Porgy and Bess? Tell us what you thought in a comment b
Video: “Bess, You Is My Woman Now,” performed by Norm Lewis and Audra Macdonald
Every day, reporters and producers at The World are hard at work bringing you human-centered news from across the globe. But we can’t do it without you. We need your support to ensure we can continue this work for another year.
Make a gift today, and you’ll help us unlock a matching gift of $67,000!