Apple retaliates against NYT for exposing labor practices

Apple appears to be retaliating against The New York Times for its excellent series of articles on Apple's manufacturing practices.

Those articles, which, among other things, explained why Apple has moved its manufacturing overseas and why no companies build high-tech gadgets in the U.S. anymore, increased the scrutiny of how Apple makes iPhones and iPads.

The articles also unearthed details that Apple presumably did not want emphasized—including how hard the people who make iPhones and iPads work and how little money they make, as well as how many Americans have been left jobless by the industry's move overseas.

From GlobalPost: Foxconn CEO: 'Managing one million animals gives me a headache'

Apple has since responded to these stories and others by beefing up its monitoring of its supply chain and defending its decision to build products in China. And sophisticated New York Times readers at least now understand precisely why Apple builds products in China—and why it has no choice to but to do so. (This trend is not Apple's fault, and it is not incumbent upon Apple to fix America's problems.)

But instead of thanking The New York Times for focusing attention on this important issue, Apple is apparently retaliating against it.

From GlobalPost: Apple, Foxconn better than most labor group says

In the past week, Apple's famously aggressive PR team gave the Wall Street Journal an exclusive interview with CEO Tim Cook—an interview that produced an important scoop about how Apple is effectively merging the app functionality of its iPhone and Mac operating systems.

Apple also gave an exclusive interview with Phil Schiller, Apple's marketing chief, to a dazzled John Gruber, a blogger who runs a popular Apple fan site.

And what did The New York Times get?


Erik Wemple of The Washington Post spoke to a source at The New York Times who offered the paper's theory for the snub:
“They are playing access journalism … I’ve heard it from people inside Apple: They said, 'look, you guys are going to get less access based on the iEconomy series.'”

Sour grapes?


But also probably the truth.

This, of course, is exactly the way the traditional mainstream media game is played. If you want to be fed "scoops" and given "exclusive interviews," you have to toe a company's line. And no company plays this game harder and more effectively than Apple, which is so popular with readers that it can bless a no-name journalist or publication with star status overnight.

Based on our experience and others, Apple's PR team does everything it can to hand out favors to journalists who write articles that it approves of and punish those who don't. This attempted manipulation consists of a variety of standard carrot and stick techniques, most of which are used to some extent by other companies as well.

The carrots include invitations to Apple's famous product launch events, flattery, and "exclusive" access to some of Apple's executives. The sticks include launch-event snubs, guilt trips, and the silent treatment.

So it would certainly be no surprise to us if The New York Times is now serving some time in Apple's penalty box.

Follow Henry Blodget on Twitter.

More from Business Insider: GOOGLE: The Wall Street Journal is full of crap — here's what that Apple "tracking" was really about

More from Business Insider: BUSTED: Google caught secretly hacking Apple software to track Apple iPhone and Mac users

More from Business Insider: If Republicans are so great for business why does Silicon Valley vote for Democrats?

More from Business Insider: DEAR WALMART, MCDONALD'S AND STARBUCKS, how does you feel about paying your employees so little that most of them are poor?

More from Business Insider: This article explains why Apple makes iPhones in China and why the US is screwed

Sign up for our daily newsletter

Sign up for The Top of the World, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning.