A bipartisan group of senators is reviving an old idea: ditching the U.S. dollar bill.
The idea was re-introduced in Congress on Thursday, with a coalition arguing it’s time the U.S. caught up with the rest of the world.
If you’ve spent any time traveling abroad recently, you’ve likely noticed the trend, and picked up a lot of spare change along the way.
“The 2 euro, the 2 pound coins in England, Switzerland has the 5 franc, Sweden has the 10 krona,” said Aaron Klein, a former deputy assistant secretary with the U.S. Treasury, rattling off a list of nations with larger denomination coins.
Japan has coins as high in value as 500 yen — more than $6.
In the U.S., the quarter is the largest denomination in wide circulation.
Klein is part of a bipartisan group called the Dollar Coin Alliance, which wants the US to get in line with the rest of the industrialized world. They argue, while coins cost more to produce, they last more than 30 years. American dollar bills fall apart in a little more than five years, on average.
“According to the Government Accountability Office, it could save $4.4 billion over 30 years,” said Klein. “Other countries, including Canada that have gone through this experience have actually saved far more than the official government estimates, so savings could be even higher.”
Seems like a no-brainer.
But not so fast.
First, it should be said, the bipartisan bill introduced Thursday is authored by senators from mining states like Arizona and Wyoming. Their states stand to benefit from the production of more copper-core coins.
Democrat Tom Harkin of Iowa is a co-author. His state is home to the company PMX, which supplies metal alloys to the U.S. mint to help make coins.
Doug Crane represents the paper side of it. He’s with Crane & Company in western Massachusetts. His family has been supplying the paper for our money since the time of Paul Revere.
He said the government will indeed save money by switching to coins, “but it’s based on large costs that are borne by the American public.”
There’s an economics concept called seigniorage. That’s the revenue the government earns by issuing money.
Basically, every time the government issues a $1 bill or coin, it invests the proceeds and earns interest. The more hard currency out there, the more interest the government is earning. Now, if we ditch our dollar bills, they’d need to be replaced by a lot of extra coins.
“Because coins sit on bureau tops and get lost in couch cushions and car seats, it takes more coins to do the same job in circulation as a bank note,” Crane said.
According to the Government Accountability Office, it could take 50 percent more coins to replace dollar bills taken out of circulation.
And this is how the government could “save” $4.4 billion — with all that extra hard currency out there. And if we're stashing all those new coins in our sock drawers, we’re not earning interest at the bank.
“It’s essentially a tax,” Crane contends.
But all of this assumes that we’ll treat dollar coins the same way as nickels and dimes. How do our neighbors to the north do it? Canada hasn’t printed its dollar bill since 1989.
John Barber, a former columnist with Toronto's Globe and Mail, says he stores the coins in jars, like with nickels and dimes. But it's not exactly the same.
“There are two jars though. One has the loonies and the toonies, the other has the nickels and dimes and the pennies," he said.
Loonies and toonies is Canada-speak for $1 and $2 coins. Barber said it’s nice to reach into the jar and quickly fish out $20 bucks.
“The only downside of the $1 coin and $2 coin is that coins tend to slip out of your pocket. I never gave my children an allowance, because they were always digging $5 and $10 out of the cushions, rather than 50 cents or so, as they used to do,” he said.
Yet another factor for Congress to consider as they debate: coin vs. bill.
Sign up for The Top of the World, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning.