Why are Chemical Weapons Worse?

The World

While President Obama focuses today on the 50th anniversary of the March on Washington his administration is grappling with a very difficult decision on Syria.

The conflict there could expand.

Israel and other nations across the Middle East are mobilizing reserves and going on high-alert because of fears of a regional war.

The US and its allies are mulling the possibility of a military strike to punish the Syrian government for its alleged use of chemical weapons last week.

But huge questions remain–over the current lack of evidence of responsibility for the attack; and what legal authority there is for war.

Peter Beinart has his own question.

Beinart is senior political writer for the Daily Beast.

He wants to know: “Why is it worse to kill civilians with chemical weapons than some other way?”

Do you support journalism that strengthens our democracy?

At The World, we believe strongly that human-centered journalism is at the heart of an informed public and a strong democracy. We see democracy and journalism as two sides of the same coin. If you care about one, it is imperative to care about the other.

Every day, our nonprofit newsroom seeks to inform and empower listeners and hold the powerful accountable. Neither would be possible without the support of listeners like you. If you believe in our work, will you give today? We need your help now more than ever!