From Hinckley to Loughner: the insanity defense
In June 1982, John Hinckley, Jr. ? President Reagan’s would-be assassin ? was found not guilty by reason of insanity. The announcement sparked widespread public criticism, as many believed that the verdict, for all practical purposes, exonerated the man who tried to kill the president. Nearly thirty years later, it seems likely that Jared Loughner, the man charged with attempted assassination and murder after last weekend’s deadly shooting spree in Tucson, will also plead insanity in his case.
David Bruck, Clinical Professor of Law at Washington and Lee University School of Law, and career capital defense attorney helps contextualize the use of the insanity defense. He looks at the evolution of both the idea of insanity and the legal action based on state of mind.
The story you just read is accessible and free to all because thousands of listeners and readers contribute to our nonprofit newsroom. We go deep to bring you the human-centered international reporting that you know you can trust. To do this work and to do it well, we rely on the support of our listeners. If you appreciated our coverage this year, if there was a story that made you pause or a song that moved you, would you consider making a gift to sustain our work through 2024 and beyond?