Warren Buffett explains why stocks are better than gold
WASHINGTON, DC – FEBRUARY 15: Investor Warren Buffett is presented with the 2010 Medal of Freedom by U.S. President Barack Obama during an East Room event at the White House February 15, 2011 in Washington, DC.
Warren Buffett watchers won't be surprised by the news that the Berkshire Hathaway CEO is not a fan of gold, and instead prefers investments in real productive enterprises.
In the latest issue of Fortune, Buffett has a "preview" of his upcoming annual shareholders letter, which will come out in late February.
In it he acknowledges his dislike of currency based investments, given the ongoing devaluation of the dollar and so on.
But contra many, who like gold as a hedge against devaluation and instability, Buffett still likes companies.
And he provides a simple argument for why.
Today the world's gold stock is about 170,000 metric tons. If all of this gold were melded together, it would form a cube of about 68 feet per side. (Picture it fitting comfortably within a baseball infield.) At $1,750 per ounce — gold's price as I write this — its value would be about $9.6 trillion. Call this cube pile A.
Let's now create a pile B costing an equal amount. For that, we could buy all U.S. cropland (400 million acres with output of about $200 billion annually), plus 16 Exxon Mobils (the world's most profitable company, one earning more than $40 billion annually). After these purchases, we would have about $1 trillion left over for walking-around money (no sense feeling strapped after this buying binge). Can you imagine an investor with $9.6 trillion selecting pile A over pile B?
Beyond the staggering valuation given the existing stock of gold, current prices make today's annual production of gold command about $160 billion. Buyers — whether jewelry and industrial users, frightened individuals, or speculators — must continually absorb this additional supply to merely maintain an equilibrium at present prices.
A century from now the 400 million acres of farmland will have produced staggering amounts of corn, wheat, cotton, and other crops — and will continue to produce that valuable bounty, whatever the currency may be. Exxon Mobil (XOM) will probably have delivered trillions of dollars in dividends to its owners and will also hold assets worth many more trillions (and, remember, you get 16 Exxons). The 170,000 tons of gold will be unchanged in size and still incapable of producing anything. You can fondle the cube, but it will not respond.
Hard to argue with, no?
See Also
Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.
Follow Joe Weisenthal on Twitter.
Ask Joe A Question >
More from our partners at Business Insider:
What Sandy Weill's $88 Million Penthouse Sale Teaches You About Being A Dealmaker
Co-Stars Schwarzenegger And Stallone Coincidentally Hospitalized Together—Here's Today's Buzz
1991 FBI Report On Steve Jobs: 'Several Individuals Questioned Mr. Jobs' Honesty'
Most Americans Agree: Young People Today Are Getting Screwed
We Have Video Of Mitt Romney Tying His Dog To The Roof Of His Car
At The World, we believe strongly that human-centered journalism is at the heart of an informed public and a strong democracy. We see democracy and journalism as two sides of the same coin. If you care about one, it is imperative to care about the other.
Every day, our nonprofit newsroom seeks to inform and empower listeners and hold the powerful accountable. Neither would be possible without the support of listeners like you. If you believe in our work, will you give today? We need your help now more than ever!