Last Friday, the Nigerian government announced on Twitter that it had indefinitely suspended the platform.
The move came two days after Twitter deleted a controversial tweet that Nigerian President Muhammadu Buhari made about a secessionist movement.
In recent months, pro-Biafra separatists with the Indigenous Peoples of Biafra (IPOB) in southeastern Nigeria have been accused of attacking police and government buildings. In his tweet, Buhari vowed to “treat them in the language they understand.”
Twitter deleted Buhari’s post last Wednesday, calling it abusive.
Related: Twitter bans actor Kangana Ranaut for hate speech
Buhari’s indefinite Twitter ban has raised concerns about free speech in Nigeria and also the perhaps outsized power of a US-based social media company to silence a Nigerian president.
The World spoke with Nigerian writers Adaobi Tricia Nwaubani and Kọ́lá Túbọ̀sún about the Twitter scandal that has many talking online and offline about its implications.
Túbọ̀sún, based in Lagos, said that the Twitter ban signals the government’s slide into a dictatorship.
“Not only were they trying to muzzle Twitter or prevent [people] from using it, they started talking about criminalizing the use of the platform…”
“Not only were they trying to muzzle Twitter or prevent [people] from using it, they started talking about criminalizing the use of the platform, which has crossed from just a government regulation into actually the stifling of free speech and the freedom of the press,” he said.
“They were compelling media houses to delete their Twitter handles. … [This is] reminiscent of a time in the past when a president can just say something through a decree,” noting that Buhari already has a reputation for shutting down dissent.
Nwaubani, based in the capital of Abuja, said that Twitter’s decision to delete Buhari’s controversial tweet sets up an inconsistent double standard that’s nearly impossible to regulate across the board.
Related: Twitter purges state-linked disinfo accounts; US sanctions ICC staff
“I’m not sure that I’m comfortable with some millennial, you know, swiveling on a chair in the Silicon Valley — seeing outrage from Nigerians, and he doesn’t know how many Nigerians, he doesn’t know what section [of Nigeria], he doesn’t understand the context — and just comes and deletes the tweets of a president of an African country.”
“As much as the tweet was ill-advised,” she said, “I’m not sure that I’m comfortable with some millennial, you know, swiveling on a chair in the Silicon Valley — seeing outrage from Nigerians, and he doesn’t know how many Nigerians, he doesn’t know what section [of Nigeria], he doesn’t understand the context — and just comes and deletes the tweets of a president of an African country. I think that was also ill-advised,” she said.
Nwaubani noted that the Biafran separatist group also has provocative tweets that remain online and so do other presidents and high-level leaders in Africa.
“If you’re going to [delete Buhari], then … go to every president around Africa,” she said. “You can’t just single out the president of a country and just delete a conversation he’s having with these people.”
Túbọ̀sún’s counterpoint: It’s not about Africans versus non-Africans or Silicon Valley young people versus political heads — it’s about rules and regulations for all.
“What we should demand is that the rules be equally applied. … The president is not above the law. If you’re signed [on] to use the platform, you should definitely abide by the rules.”
“What we should demand is that the rules be equally applied,” he said. “The president is not above the law. If you’re signed [on] to use the platform, you should definitely abide by the rules.”
Nwaubani said Buhari’s Twitter ban is likely more to do with a bruised ego and protecting his strong-man image than anything else.
Túbọ̀sún hopes the lesson here is that no matter how bruised a president’s ego, it’s still the job of a democratically elected government to protect citizens’ right to free speech.
Related: Teen’s TikTok video takes on Malaysia’s toxic culture of misogyny
But “Nigeria wouldn’t grind to a halt if Twitter disappears,” said Nwaubani, who noted that out of Nigeria’s 200 million people, only about 16% use social media.
Still, there are an estimated 40 million Twitter users in Nigeria, and many are now using virtual private networks to log onto the popular platform, despite warnings that they could face arrest.
This article is written based on an interview and has been edited and condensed for clarity. AP contributed to this report.
The World is an independent newsroom. We’re not funded by billionaires; instead, we rely on readers and listeners like you. As a listener, you’re a crucial part of our team and our global community. Your support is vital to running our nonprofit newsroom, and we can’t do this work without you. Will you support The World with a gift today? Donations made between now and Dec. 31 will be matched 1:1. Thanks for investing in our work!