A federal judge halts six executions in Arkansas, citing ‘cruel and unusual punishment’

Agence France-Presse
Asa Hutchinson

A US federal judge on Saturday blocked a plan by the southern state of Arkansas to execute a series of inmates there over a 10-day period this month, citing a constitutional amendment banning "cruel and unusual punishment."

The state's Republican governor, Asa Hutchinson, had argued that the executions — which would have been the state's first since 2005 — had to be rushed through because one of the drugs used in lethal injections was due to expire. 

The ruling by Judge Kristine Baker of the Eastern District of Arkansas covers nine inmates — six set to die this month, two who had earlier received temporary stays of execution and one whose death had yet to be scheduled.

"The Court finds that plaintiffs are entitled to a preliminary injunction based on their method of execution claim under the Eighth Amendment," Baker wrote in her decision. That amendment bars "cruel and unusual punishment."

Lawyers for the death-row inmates had argued that the accelerated schedule did not give them enough time to prepare their appeals.

A spokesperson for state Attorney General Leslie Rutledge said Arkansas planned to appeal the federal ruling, saying, "It is unfortunate that a US district judge has chosen to side with the convicted prisoners in one of their many last-minute attempts to delay justice."

But Hutchinson's plan faces other legal obstacles. In addition to the stays granted two men, an Arkansas circuit court judge, Wendell Griffen of Pulaski County, on Friday issued a temporary restraining order barring authorities from using vecuronium bromide, part of a lethal three-drug cocktail the state intended to use.

Inmates
Inmates Bruce Ward(top row L to R), Don Davis, Ledell Lee, Stacy Johnson, Jack Jones (bottom row L to R), Marcel Williams, Kenneth Williams and Jason Mcgehee are shown in these booking photos provided on March 21, 2017.Courtesy Arkansas Department of Corrections/Handout via Reuters (file photo)

Death-penalty opponents have long argued that death by injection, which was meant to be painless, is anything but, with several inmates dying long and agonizing deaths. 

Hutchinson's plan has drawn worldwide attention. The European Union issued a statement strongly opposing the plan, and anti-death penalty protests have grown in front of the Arkansas capitol in Little Rock.

Executions in the US have fallen steadily for years, hitting their lowest level in 2016 — partly because the drugs used in lethal injection have become so hard to obtain.

Several pharmaceutical companies, notably European-based ones, refuse to allow their drugs to be used in executions.

Judge Griffen issued his ruling to allow time to study a request from drug distributor McKesson Corporation for the use of the anesthetic to be banned in state executions.

McKesson contends that Arkansas penal authorities purchased the vecuronium bromide, which provokes muscular paralysis, without warning that it would be used to put inmates to death.

Invest in independent global news

The World is an independent newsroom. We’re not funded by billionaires; instead, we rely on readers and listeners like you. As a listener, you’re a crucial part of our team and our global community. Your support is vital to running our nonprofit newsroom, and we can’t do this work without you. Will you support The World with a gift today? Donations made between now and Dec. 31 will be matched 1:1. Thanks for investing in our work!