This week, Critical State digs into new research about legislative oversight when it comes to security issues. As historian Peter Roady writes in a new article in the Journal of Policy History, the National Security Agency has escaped congressional oversight with two words: “It’s classified.”
Yesterday U.S. officials released new documents showing that the National Security Agency (NSA) may have unintentionally collected as many as 56,000 emails from Americans between 2008 and 2011. None of the individuals targeted had any connection to terrorism, but rather the communications were swept up inadvertently alongside targeted materials. Private telecommunications providers like AT&T were […]
The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance court has a PR problem. Its very existence as a “secret court” has rankled critics, who’ve demanded greater transparency. James Carr, who served on the court from 2002 to 2008 has offered his own solution to mend the public’s confidence in the court.
The New York Times this weekend revealed an expansion of power concentrated in the FISA court, the judges charged with reviewing government surveillance requests and approving or rejecting them. In virtually all cases, though, they’re approved. And new rulings show how that power is expanding.
At least two terrorist attacks, including a plot against the New York Stock Exchange, were thwarted thanks to government surveillance programs, U.S. officials said at an Intelligence Committee meeting Tuesday. The government has been trying to reframe the conversation around the programs after their existence was made public by Edward Snowden.