Frisking

Stop-and-frisk policy not unique to New York

Global Politics

New York City’s stop-and-frisk practice was declared unconstitutional by a federal judge Monday. The city’s leadership claimed the policy, a violation of the fourth amendment preventing unreasonable search and seizure, was a success in reducing crime.

Predicting Crime Through Data

Shooting Victim Speaks Out on Stop-And-Frisk

Federal Judge Finds NYC’s Stop-And-Frisk Policy Unconstitutional

How New York’s ‘Stop and Frisk’ Compares to Britain’s ‘Stop and Search’

Conflict & Justice
Tell us about your experience accessing The World

We want to hear your feedback so we can keep improving our website, theworld.org. Please fill out this quick survey and let us know your thoughts (your answers will be anonymous). Thanks for your time!

We respect your time, attention and privacy

This is a news website, not a click casino. We do NOT employ deceptive behaviors, display annoying ads or use third party cookies and trackers to monetize your visit or help advertisers track you across the internet.

Simply, we ask that you would consider a donation to support the journalism we produce every weekday. Thank you.