NJ Supreme Court: Warrants Required to Collect Cell Phone Data

The Takeaway

It’s been more than a month since revelations about the NSA’s mass surveillance programs surfaced and it seems that states are pushing back. Last week, the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled that regardless of federal policy, state law enforcement officers must get a warrant in order to obtain cell phone tracking information.
The practice of using this information without a warrant has been found to be widespread, and often hidden from the public.
The landmark decision in New Jersey comes as other states and jurisdictions try to set the boundary between citizens’ rights to privacy around their personal data and the needs of law enforcement on the other.
Montana, for instance, recently became the first state to pass a law that requires a warrant to obtain cell phone tracking information.
Peter Verniero, a former New Jersey Attorney General and state Supreme Court Justice, and Susan Freiwald, a University of San Francisco Law Professor, explain.
Stay up to date with The Takeaway–become a Facebook fan & follow us on Twitter!

Will you support The World? 

The story you just read is accessible and free to all because thousands of listeners and readers contribute to our nonprofit newsroom. We go deep to bring you the human-centered international reporting that you know you can trust. To do this work and to do it well, we rely on the support of our listeners. If you appreciated our coverage this year, if there was a story that made you pause or a song that moved you, would you consider making a gift to sustain our work through 2024 and beyond?