Assault weapons ban passes Senate committee (VIDEO)
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) speaks at a press conference on Capitol Hill on January 24, 2013 in Washington, DC. House and Senate Democrats where joined by law enforcement officials to introduce the “Assault Weapons Ban of 2013” legislation to ban assault style weapons and high capacity magazines.
A proposed assault weapons ban barely cleared a Senate committee today, but not before a heated argument over the Second Amendment.
The Democrat-led Senate Judiciary Committee approved the bill sponsored by Sen. Dianne Feinstein on a strictly party-line vote — 10-8 — and rejected a series of Republican amendments, The Associated Press reported.
More from GlobalPost: Gun control measures pass Senate committee, assault weapons vote delayed
The amendments, also struck down on party lines, would have exempted victims of sexual abuse, people living along the Mexican border and others from the proposed ban.
The bill would ban semiautomatic weapons with at least one military feature and limit the size of ammunition clips to 10 rounds, according to the Washington Post.
It faced fierce opposition from Republicans on the committee, includ Sen. Ted Cruz from Texas, who questioned its constitutionality.
More from GlobalPost: Sen. Feinstein optimistic about assault weapons ban despite 'uphill fight'
“The question that I would pose to the senior senator from California is would she deem it consistent with the Bill of Rights for Congress to engage in the same endeavor that we are contemplating doing with the Second Amendment in the context of the First or Fourth Amendment?” he asked, according to ABC News.
Feinstein shot back that she wasn't "a sixth grader" and didn't need a lecture on the Constitution.
“Senator, I’ve been on this committee for 20 years. I was a mayor for nine years," she said. "I walked in, I saw people shot. I’ve looked at bodies that have been shot with these weapons. I’ve seen the bullets that implode. In Sandy Hook, youngsters were dismembered.”
“I’m not a lawyer, but after 20 years I’ve been up close and personal to the Constitution. I have great respect for it. This doesn’t mean that weapons of war and the Heller decision clearly points out three exceptions, two of which are pertinent here,” she said. “It’s fine you want to lecture me on the Constitution. I appreciate it. Just know I’ve been here for a long time. I’ve passed on a number of bills. I’ve studied the Constitution myself. I am reasonably well educated, and I thank you for the lecture.”
Feinstein later apologized to Cruz, saying he "sort of got my dander up and that happens on occasion."
The World is an independent newsroom. We’re not funded by billionaires; instead, we rely on readers and listeners like you. As a listener, you’re a crucial part of our team and our global community. If you’ve been thinking about making a donation, this is the best time to do it. Your support is vital to running our nonprofit newsroom, and we can’t do this work without you. All donations between now and June 30 will be matched 2:1. Will you help keep our newsroom on strong footing by giving to The World?